Essentially, this says that risk parity strategies approach portfolio allocation based on the underlying asset's risk/volatility as opposed to traditional portfolio allocation which allocates capital based on holding some specified amount of each asset class.
David Woo went on to elaborate that traditional asset class correlations began to break down during this selloff, implying that traditional methods of diversification were no longer viable and as a result any fund/fund manager which allocates capital on the basis of 'risk parity' or similar strategies would be forced to reduce risk across all asset classes.
I thought this was a brilliant insight and immediately wanted to see if I could find some evidence that would support his analysis.
To do this I used my Composite ETF model to plot rolling correlations of the 'Bonds' ETF composite vs the ETF composite of each asset class. The reason I use rolling correlation is because of the inherent link between asset correlations and volatility. Specifically, as correlations across assets/asset classes rise diversification decreases and volatility/tail risk increases. I've selected some of the more interesting plots that lend credence to his statement.
bonds vs asia-pac equity